|
ED-RED
Honorable Members of the Education Funding
Advisory Board: ED-RED* respectfully requests the following actions on
the part of the Education Funding Advisory Board:
- Renew the Continuing Appropriations Act
- Increase the Foundation Level
- Maintain Hold Harmless in the current
formula
- Identify poverty students using the most
reliable count available
- Provide assistance to every student in
the poverty count
- Increase Special Ed personnel reimbursement
- Implement unified Special Ed formula to
replace other categorical programs
- Eliminate tax
rate ceilings to provide flexibility within the tax cap
- Recognize the substantial erosion of EAV/property
value due to Property Tax Appeals Board decisions in Cook County
*ED-RED represents 104 suburban school
districts, 2 special education joint agreements and 2 Intermediate
Service Centers, all located in Suburban Cook, DuPage and Lake Counties.
ED-RED Districts serve approximately 300,000 children.
Special Education Funding
Why Change
Is Needed
Both federal
and Illinois law mandate that special education be provided to students
with disabilities. Approximately 13% of Illinois students receive some
sort of special education services and the costs of these programs are
having an increasing impact on Illinois school districts for several reasons:
- The
Illinois special education mandate exceeds federal requirements and
prescribes maximum class sizes and teacher caseloads. Waivers of these
regulations are not permitted and local boards of education have less
control over the growth of special education costs.
- Special
education costs have grown significantly and are consuming a greater
portion of district budgets. A recent national study reported that more
than 38 percent of all new education dollars between 1967 and 1991 went
to special education, while only 26 percent of new monies went to general
education.
- The students
receiving special education services have increasingly severe disabilities
and the services they require are costing more. The Center on Special
Education Finance estimates that special education costs 2.3 times more
per student than regular education. For example, the annual cost of
educating a child with a severe disability can often exceed $25,000.
Personnel reimbursement
is the largest source of state funding for special education. This program,
defined in 5/14-13.01 of the School Code, provides $8,000 reimbursement
for each full-time certified special education professional employed by
a district and $2,800 or 50% of salary (whichever is less) for each non-certified
employee.
The primary difficulty with this formula
results from the fact that it is based upon a flat, fixed rate.
Consequently, the formula has not kept pace with inflation and normal
increases in teacher salaries and school districts have had to assume
local responsibility for an ever increasing proportion of these costs.
For example, in 1985, the $6000 reimbursement contributed approximately
32% of the $26,000 average teacher salary. In contrast, the average salary
in FY96 was $40,900 and state reimbursement contributed only 20% of the
cost. Despite steadily increasing personnel costs there has been no
change in the reimbursement level since 1985 (see charts below).
Proposed Changes
- Increase
the level of Personnel Reimbursement to provide a greater proportion
of actual costs.
- Support the proposed unified special
education funding formula (HB558). HB558 had been approved
unanimously by the House and has strong bipartisan support.
|
- The Formula Provides More State
Aid for Education - This formula will, over time, provide
approximately 250 million new dollars for special education.
This will help relieve the burden placed upon local school districts
to fund high cost special education programs and provide much
needed additional dollars to improve special education services.
- "Placement Neutrality"
- Students will receive the same level of funding regardless of
the restrictiveness of their program, complying with the new IDEA
requirements.
- Equity - Every school district
will receive funding based on the same enrollment driven formula.
- Simplicity - A great deal
of paper will be eliminated and the formula will be easy to administer.
- The Proposed Formula is Progressive
- Special education funding will increase proportionately as general
state aid increases.
|
|