From: STATE SUPERINTENDENT
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002
4:54 PM
To: 'District
Superintendents, ROEs, Directors of Special Education'
Subject: EFAB Recommendations and
SAT Results
Good
afternoon. I have two timely items for
you.
First, I was in
attendance at the Education Funding Advisory Board meeting at the State Board
offices today. Following significant
discussion, the members made recommendations regarding the state’s school
funding system. Below is the statement I
issued this afternoon, followed by EFAB’s news release.
Second, the
College Board released the 2002 SAT and Advanced Placement results. Although our number of test-takers is small,
they have once again distinguished our state as the highest performing in the
nation on both the SAT and AP tests.
Statement
by State Superintendent Robert E. Schiller Regarding EFAB Recommendations
Local school districts are facing
severe financial challenges throughout Illinois as the cost of providing a
quality education is rising in all categories – from salaries and benefits to
transportation and maintenance of facilities.
I believe there is general
agreement – even in these generally difficult fiscal times -- that public
education in Illinois needs more money and that the state should provide a
greater proportional share of school funding than it does currently.
The members of the Governor’s
Education Funding Advisory Board are to be commended and thanked for the
careful job they have done of outlining avenues by which we can reach those
goals.
The issues raised by EFAB come
around for serious discussion every few years in our state, and they are
certain to cause much public debate. In large part, that is the purpose of the
work EFAB has done. EFAB’s suggested combination of property tax relief and
state revenue increases would assure that the state will provide the majority
of funding for elementary and secondary education. Its recommendations in the
area of school district consolidation surely will bring about much discussion.
It is now up to all of us in the
education community – and all Illinois taxpayers -- to evaluate carefully
EFAB’s revenue-generating suggestions and comment on them. That is what the
State Board of Education will do in the coming weeks.
**************************************************
Education Funding
Advisory Board
NEWS
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Further
information: 217/782-4648
August 27, 2002
Cut Property Taxes, Increase
State Support for Schools, Education Funding Board Says
The state’s Education Funding Advisory Board recommends a
substantial reduction in local property taxes, a sizable increase in state
support for schools and adding incentives to encourage school
consolidation.
EFAB members hammered out the recommendations in Springfield
Tuesday after more than two years of deliberations and extensive discussions by
work groups looking in-depth at problems with the school funding system. The group will hold three public hearings around
the state to get comments and suggestions before submitting the final report to
the Governor and General Assembly in January.
“The problems with school funding have been studied since I began
my education career in Illinois forty years ago,” said Robert Leininger, EFAB
chair and a former State Superintendent of Education. “Every study has shown we are too dependent
on local property taxes and the state is not paying its fair share in
supporting our schools. Illinois ranks
near the bottom of all states in terms of the percentage of school funding from
the state.”
“We don’t need more studies to tell us the Illinois school funding
system needs fixed. These
recommendations are designed to provide the framework to fix the school funding
system. We want comments and suggestions, but we strongly believe that it is
time that all policymakers stand up for the future of this state by acting to
fix the way Illinois funds its schools.”
PROPERTY TAX RELIEF OF SEVERAL BILLION DOLLARS
EFAB proposes that local property taxes for education be cut by 25
to 50 % and replaced dollar-for-dollar by the state. Illinois property owners pay about $9 billion
in property taxes for education, so property tax relief would be between $2.25
billion to $4.5 billion. No school would
lose money or access to property tax support under the EFAB plan, since the
state would replace the decreased property taxes dollar-for-dollar.
INCREASED STATE SUPPORT FOR SCHOOLS
EFAB recommends that General State Aid be increased to support a
Foundation Level within the range of $5,665 to $6,680 per pupil – an increase from
the present level of $4,560. The
proposed level is based on studies of the spending practices of successful and
efficient school districts. A variety of
revenue replacement options were suggested by EFAB. Much could be generated by raising the income
tax rate, closing loopholes and graduating exemptions. The sales tax rate could be reduced while
providing additional revenue by broadening the tax base.
In addition, the recommendations call for the elimination of hold
harmless and reinstatement of the continuing appropriation to assure districts
of funding stability. A Department of
Human Services poverty count would be used for calculating poverty grants for
districts, rather than the ten-year census count.
The combination of property tax relief and state revenue increases
assures that the state will provide the majority of funding for elementary and
secondary education.
SCHOOL DISTRICT REORGANIZATION
Unit districts are the preferred school district organizational
structure with high schools enrolling a minimum of 250 students, according to
EFAB. Rather than requiring schools to consolidate, EFAB recommends a
reasonable approach by expanding the incentives for reaching these targets. Presently, the state has 893 school
districts, 407 of which are units while 103 are high school districts and 383
are elementary districts. Having all
unit districts would simplify the funding mechanism, increase equity among
districts and provide efficiencies in the delivery of services.
To accomplish this reorganization, EFAB proposes that the current
incentives be continued and additional incentives be added and that feasibility
studies be required in all districts. If
consolidation resulted in the need for a new building, EFAB proposes that the
state fund 100 % of the cost of the building.
In addition, a state implementation grant should accompany the
reorganization and the new district should get a five-year exemption from the
state designation system.
While many categorical programs remain unchanged, the
recommendations provide for a new transportation formula and a study to combine
special education funding sources.
Combining some existing programs into block grants would increase the
flexibility for local school districts while reducing the paperwork necessary
to receive state funds.
Other recommendations include a simplification and reorganization
of school district accounting and reporting procedures through a reduction in
the number of levies and accounting funds
******************************
Illinois
State Board of Education
NEWS
Illinois students again outperform nation on SAT, AP exams
Embargoed Until 10:30 a.m.
(Eastern) For
Information: 217/782-4648
Tuesday, August 27
Illinois high school students who
take the SAT college-entrance examination continue to far outperform their
peers throughout the nation, State Superintendent of Education Robert E.
Schiller reported today.
Advanced Placement examination
results for 2001-2002 also showed Illinois students outpacing the nation,
Schiller said.
Mathematics scores for Illinois’
2002 public and nonpublic high school graduates who took the SAT I averaged 80
points above the national average in 2002 and verbal scores were 74 points
higher. In addition, student gains
over the last five years and the last ten years were higher for Illinois
students than any other state. The
greatest improvements for the 2002 graduating class were recorded by Asians,
blacks and American Indians.
The average SAT I verbal score
for all public and nonpublic graduates tested was 578, up 2 points from 2001
and 16 from the 1997 average of 562; for mathematics the score increased 7
points to 596 from 589 in 2001 and 18 points from 578 in 1997.
About 68 % of students who took
the SAT I were from public schools.
Their verbal scores averaged 578, the same as the Illinois group
overall. In mathematics, public school
students averaged 605, exceeding overall state average by 9 points.
"While SAT and AP exams are
taken by only a small percentage of Illinois students, the results clearly show
that this group of students is meeting high achievement targets," Schiller
said. "These students, their
parents and their schools are setting the pace for our state and nation.”
About 11 percent of Illinois'
high school students take the SAT, compared to the ACT that is now given to
almost all public high school students as a part of the Prairie State
Achievement Examination. Each of the SAT
I tests is scored on an 800-point scale.
AP results lead nation
On Advanced Placement tests,
scores of 4 or 5, the two highest scores, were achieved by 44 % of Illinois
students compared to 36 % for students throughout the country. The most popular AP examination subjects for
Illinois students in 2001-2002 were United States History; English Literature
and Composition; and Calculus.
The State Board provides
incentives for schools to increase participation on AP exams. In 2001, the State Board provided fee support
for over 2000 students and in 2002 for over 3500 students. Data released today show strong increases in
AP test participation for the last several years.
Almost 37,000 Illinois students
took AP exams in the 2001-2002 school year, compared to under 33,000 in the previous
year. There were 484 Illinois schools
with students taking AP examinations in 2001-2002.
The College Board also
administers the Advanced Placement tests taken by high school students, often
for dual credit with higher education institutions.
Robert Schiller
State Superintendent
of Education
statesup@isbe.net