Good Afternoon. This has been an extraordinarily
busy week with the regular State Board meeting and State Board presentations
before four legislative committees.
In addition to updating you on those events, today’s message includes two
important administrative alerts, brief comments on several other topics and, at
the end, a fairly lengthy description of the recent federal guidance on Constitutionally protected
prayer.
Administrative
Alerts
Legislative
presentations
Chairman Gidwitz and I had an
opportunity this week to make formal remarks to the Senate Executive Committee,
the Senate Education Committee, and I also appeared before the House Elementary
and Secondary Appropriations Committee.
Those remarks can be accessed on the State Board home page (http://www.isbe.net/) and I urge you to read
them to understand the positions we are taking on school finance and related
issues.
In summary, we advised committee
members that the precarious financial condition of
In addition, we spoke in support of
a number of specific programs and positions as well as several of the EFAB
recommendations. This included SB 1
which would reinstate the continuing appropriation for education funding. Again, I encourage you to review those
comments for their specific recommendations.
On Thursday, I met with the House
Education Committee to discuss the No Child Left Behind
Act and its implications for
All of our discussions with members
of the General Assembly are enhanced when we are able to give specific examples
of challenges faced by local districts.
Therefore, we would appreciate your sharing with us any circumstances in
your district that we could in turn share with the legislators. We also hope that you will take every
opportunity to support our call for education as the priority in this difficult
budget year.
Reminder: the House Appropriations
Committee will hold another in its series of hearings on school finance issues
next Wednesday at
State
Board decisions on NCLB accountability
issues
On Wednesday, the State Board
approved the recommendations of the Assessment and Accountability Task Force
regarding NCLB accountability. The
decisions included the following:
For additional information about
these decisions and the approved recommendations regarding the IMAGE assessment,
see the press release at
http:/www.isbe.net/news/2003/feb19-03.htm.
State
Board officers and committees
The State Board Bylaws require
election of the Board Vice-Chair and Secretary every two years. The elections held yesterday resulted in
the selection of Bev Turkal
of Robinson as Vice-Chair and Dick Sandsmark of
Chairman Gidwitz appointed the
following Board members as committee chairs:
Board Operations Committee – Janet Steiner
Education Policy/Planning Committee – Marjorie
Branch
Finance and Audit Committee – Dick Sandsmark
Governmental Relations – Bev Turkal
Janet Steiner will join Chairman
Gidwitz as State Board members on the Joint Education Committee. Greg Kazarian
will serve as the alternate to that committee.
Appointment
of Interim Certification Board Secretary
In response to the imminent
retirement of Rob Sampson, Secretary to the State Teacher Certification Board
since 1997, the State Board appointed Dennis Williams to serve as Interim
Secretary. Dennis is the Division
Administrator for Certificate Renewal and Leadership.
Education
License Plate
The State of
The new education plate will cost
$118 for the initial purchase ($40 plus the standard $78 registration fee), $25
of which will be deposited in the Education Fund. License plate production will begin once
850
To sign up for the plate with the
Secretary of State’s office, go online at www.cyberdriveillinois.com or call
217/558-6148.
Three good citizens have accepted my
request that they serve on the new Financial Oversight Panel for
Constitutionally
protected prayer
|
Guidance was
issued last week by the U.S. Department of Education regarding
constitutionally protected prayer in public elementary and secondary
schools. It is located on the agency web site at: http://www.ed.gov/inits/religionandschools/prayer_guidance.html. I suggest you
read the guidance for several reasons. One reason is that you and your
district need to know about these parameters. The second reason is that for
2002-03 and 2003-04 and thereafter you will need to sign assurances that
this process is in place in your school
district. Section 9524 of
No Child Left
Behind (NCLB) requires that, as a condition of receiving ESEA
funds, a district must certify in writing to its State educational agency
("SEA") that it has no policy that prevents, or otherwise denies
participation in, constitutionally protected prayer in public schools as
set forth in this guidance. The purpose of
the federal guidance is to provide SEAs,
districts, and the public with information on the current state of the law
concerning constitutionally protected prayer in the public schools, and to
clarify the extent to which prayer in public schools is legally protected.
This guidance also sets forth responsibilities with respect to Section
9524 of the ESEA. The
guidance will be updated on a biennial basis, beginning in September
2004. Certification
Process In order to
receive funds under the ESEA, a district must certify in writing to its
SEA that no policy of the LEA prevents, or otherwise denies participation
in, constitutionally protected prayer in public elementary and secondary
schools as set forth in this guidance. While the original date for
submitting this certification was Districts are
required to file the certification as a condition of receiving funds under
the ESEA. If a district fails
to file the required certification, or files it in bad faith, ISBE is to
ensure compliance in accordance with its regular enforcement procedures.
The Secretary considers a district to have filed a certification in bad
faith if the district files the certification even though it has a policy
that prevents, or otherwise denies participation in, constitutionally
protected prayer in public elementary and secondary schools as set forth
in this guidance. The
required certification/assurance document will be sent to you early next
week. I would ask that you
complete it and send it back through the ROEs/ISCs by the date stated. They in turn will aggregate data
and return it to ISBE. Detailed
Guidance The guidance on
the web site lists the full information. Here are a few chosen excerpts for
your consideration until such time as you read the full
document. Prayer
During Non-instructional Time Students may
pray when not engaged in school activities or instruction, subject to the
same rules designed to prevent material disruption of the educational
program that are applied to other privately initiated expressive
activities. Among other things, students may read their Bibles or other
scriptures, say grace before meals, and pray or study religious materials
with fellow students during recess, the lunch hour, or other
non-instructional time to the same extent that they may engage in
nonreligious activities. While school authorities may impose rules of
order and pedagogical restrictions on student activities, they may not
discriminate against student prayer or religious speech in applying such
rules and restrictions. Organized
Prayer Groups and Activities Students may
organize prayer groups, religious clubs, and "see you at the pole"
gatherings before school to the same extent that students are permitted to
organize other non-curricular student activities groups. Such groups must
be given the same access to school facilities for assembling as is given
to other non-curricular groups, without discrimination because of the
religious content of their expression. School authorities possess
substantial discretion concerning whether to permit the use of school
media for student advertising or announcements regarding non-curricular
activities. However, where student groups that meet for nonreligious
activities are permitted to advertise or announce their meetings—for
example, by advertising in a student newspaper, making announcements on a
student activities bulletin board or public address system, or handing out
leaflets—school authorities may not discriminate against groups who meet
to pray. School authorities may disclaim sponsorship of non-curricular
groups and events, provided they administer such disclaimers in a manner
that neither favors nor disfavors groups that meet to engage in prayer or
religious speech. Teachers,
Administrators, and other School
Employees When acting in
their official capacities as representatives of the state, teachers,
school administrators, and other school employees are prohibited by the
Establishment Clause from encouraging or discouraging prayer, and from
actively participating in such activity with students. Teachers may,
however, take part in religious activities where the overall context makes
clear that they are not participating in their official capacities. Before
school or during lunch, for example, teachers may meet with other teachers
for prayer or Bible study to the same extent that they may engage in other
conversation or nonreligious activities. Similarly, teachers may
participate in their personal capacities in privately sponsored
baccalaureate ceremonies. Moments
of Silence If a school has
a "minute of silence" or other quiet periods during the school day,
students are free to pray silently, or not to pray, during these periods
of time. Teachers and other school employees may neither encourage nor
discourage students from praying during such time
periods. Accommodation
of Prayer During Instructional Time It has long been
established that schools have the discretion to dismiss students to
off-premises religious instruction, provided that schools do not encourage
or discourage participation in such instruction or penalize students for
attending or not attending. Similarly, schools may excuse students from
class to remove a significant burden on their religious exercise, where
doing so would not impose material burdens on other students. For example,
it would be lawful for schools to excuse Muslim students briefly from
class to enable them to fulfill their religious obligations to pray during
Ramadan. Where school
officials have a practice of excusing students from class on the basis of
parents' requests for accommodation of nonreligious needs, religiously
motivated requests for excusal may not be accorded less favorable
treatment. In addition, in some circumstances, based on federal or state
constitutional law or pursuant to state statutes, schools may be required
to make accommodations that relieve substantial burdens on students'
religious exercise. Schools officials are therefore encouraged to consult
with their attorneys regarding such
obligations. Religious
Expression and Prayer in Class
Assignments Students may
express their beliefs about religion in homework, artwork, and other
written and oral assignments free from discrimination based on the
religious content of their submissions. Such home and classroom work
should be judged by ordinary academic standards of substance and relevance
and against other legitimate pedagogical concerns identified by the
school. Thus, if a teacher's assignment involves writing a poem, the work
of a student who submits a poem in the form of a prayer (for example, a
psalm) should be judged on the basis of academic standards (such as
literary quality) and neither penalized nor rewarded on account of its
religious content. Student
Assemblies and Extracurricular Events Student speakers
at student assemblies and extracurricular activities such as sporting
events may not be selected on a basis that either favors or disfavors
religious speech. Where student speakers are selected on the basis of
genuinely neutral, evenhanded criteria and retain primary control over the
content of their expression, that expression is not attributable to the
school and therefore may not be restricted because of its religious (or
anti-religious) content. By contrast, where school officials determine or
substantially control the content of what is expressed, such speech is
attributable to the school and may not include prayer or other
specifically religious (or anti-religious) content. To avoid any mistaken
perception that a school endorses student speech that is not in fact
attributable to the school, school officials may make appropriate, neutral
disclaimers to clarify that such speech (whether religious or
nonreligious) is the speaker's and not the
school's. |
Robert
Schiller
State
Superintendent
of
Education
statesup@isbe.net