Good afternoon. This week’s most poignant moment will
occur at the close of business today, when 84 agency staff will take advantage
of the early retirement option and leave State Board service. Today’s message discusses that topic as
well as the following:
Agency
Retirements
The 84 individuals taking advantage
of the early retirement initiative today brings the total of agency retirements
under ERI to date to 139. That is a staff reduction of about 20 per cent since
June, 2002, when the first “early retirees” left. Overall, agency headcount is down by
about one-third since June, 2000.
I have not known our retirees very
long but I have come to appreciate their talents and contributions. Many of them have been with the state
education agency for many years (the retiree with the longest tenure began in
1966) and they have helped to bring about many important improvements to our
state’s educational system. You
know many of them personally and I am sure you join me in extending heartfelt
appreciation for their contributions and best wishes for all of their future
endeavors.
We have been working hard to
reassign responsibility for programs where managers and staff are retiring, and
an updated organization chart and agency contact information will be posted on
our website Monday. Meanwhile, if you have questions, call the unit
traditionally responsible for the topic or issue and you will be directed to an
appropriate respondent. If you experience difficulties reaching the people you
need to reach at ISBE, simply send an e-mail to Statesup@isbe.net and someone will be in
touch with you.
Until
such time as we can fill many vacant positions on a permanent basis, the
following supervisory and other personnel changes are effective as of March 1,
2003:
CENTER FOR TEACHING AND
LEARNING:
Lee Patton, currently
Policy Analyst, temporarily will assume the responsibilities of Frank Llano as
manager of the Teaching and Leadership Department and of Mike Long as Division
Administrator for Professional Preparation and
Recruitment.
Dennis Williams,
currently Division Administrator for Teacher Certification, will also assume the
responsibilities of Rob Sampson, retiring Division Administrator for Certificate
Renewal Division.
Kathryn Cox, currently
acting Division Supervisor for Special Education Services, will assume the
responsibilities of the retiring Jack Shook as Division Administrator of Special
Education Services –
Gail Lieberman,
currently assistant to the Director of Teaching and Learning, will temporarily
assume the responsibilities of Richard Miguel as manager of Standards-Aligned
Learning and Tanya Patton as Division Administrator of New Learning
Opportunities.
CENTER FOR PLANNING AND
PERFORMANCE:
Lynne Haeffele-Curry
continues as director. She will also be responsible for the divisions of Student
and School Progress and for External Relations; she will also temporarily serve
as division administrator for ROE Services, a position formerly held by Ray
Schaljo.
Don Full, currently
Division Administrator for Accountability, will temporarily add the duties
previously performed by Sheryl Poggi as Division Administrator for System of
Support.
Connie Wise, currently
Division Administrator for Data Analysis and Data Reporting, will also
temporarily serve as Division Administrator for Student Assessment, succeeding
Carmen Chapman-Pfeiffer.
CENTER FOR
OPERATIONS
Donna Luallen, formerly
district superintendent in
Two acting Division
Administrators have been given permanent status: Dave McDermott for Budget and
Financial Management and Deborah Vespa for School Business and Support
Services.
Robert Wolfe, becomes
Division Administrator for External Assurance, succeeding Nancy Spinner, and
Timothy Imler becomes Division Administrator for Funding and Disbursement,
succeeding Marcia Sailsbury.
CENTER FOR PUBLIC
INFORMATION
Wade Nelson, director,
will also serve as Division Administrator for Public Service and Communications,
a position held by the late Kim Knauer.
Time-sensitive
Alert for Teachers
Teachers who hold an Initial
Teaching Certificate and who will complete four years of experience by
House
Education Appropriations Committee
I appeared before the House
Education Appropriations Committee on Wednesday to discuss state categorical
funds for schools. My testimony had
two parts:
·
the need for a supplemental appropriation of $32M
this year to meet the federal maintenance of effort requirements for categorical
programs; and
·
the State Board’s budget request for full funding of
the mandated formula categorical programs, which will require an increase of
$211M.
I again pointed out, as vigorously
as it is possible to do, that underfunding of mandated categorical programs
intensifies local district financial problems, since you must provide the
services and make up for the shortage with other
funds.
An audio version of my presentation
to the committee is available on the State Board website – http://www.isbe.net.
21st
Century Community Learning Centers Grants
Thirty-five local agencies have been
awarded 21st Century Community Learning Center Grants to provide
low-income students with high-quality, after-school programs that focus on
academics, especially in reading and mathematics.
This program is part of the NCLB law
and is designed to support improved achievement. Guidelines for high-quality,
research-based after-school programs were developed in collaboration with the
Governor’s Task Force for After School Programs and the Department of Human
Resources.
Agencies eligible to apply for the
competitive grants included public school districts, public university
laboratory schools, charter schools, area vocational centers, community-based
organizations, and other public private entities. A total of 157 applications were
received and the final decisions were based on recommendations from an educator
review team. Grant recipients are
identified in a press release at http://www.isbe.net/news/2003/feb26-03.htm.
Seventeen local school districts
will share the $11M available to
Eligibility for these competitive
grants was based on the number of third-grade students not meeting the English
Language Arts Learning Standards and the number of low-income students. A list of the grant recipients can be
seen on the State Board website at http://www.isbe.net/news/2003/feb20-03.htm. Additional grants may be awarded in the
future.
Constitutionally
Protected Prayer Certification Process
As mentioned in the Superintendent's
Bulletin on February 21, 2003, Section 9524 of No Child Left Behind
(NCLB) requires that, as a condition of receiving ESEA funds, a
district must certify in writing to its State educational agency that it has no
policy that prevents, or otherwise denies participation in, constitutionally
protected prayer in public schools as set forth in the federal guidance. Information may be accessed at www.ed.gov or www.isbe.net/nclb.
In order to receive
these federal funds, a district must certify in writing that no policy of the
district prevents, or otherwise denies participation in, constitutionally
protected prayer in public elementary and secondary schools as set forth in this
guidance. While the original date
for submitting this certification was
In terms of the recent
timeframe, the district will need to provide initial certification by
________________________________________________________________Please
complete and return the following certification to your regional office of
education by March 15th. The
regional superintendent/staff will aggregate these figures and return them to
the State Board of Education [Attention: Gail Lieberman,
No
policy of the district prevents, or otherwise denies participation in
constitutionally protected prayer in public elementary schools and secondary
schools as set forth in the “Guidance on Constitutionally Protected Prayer in
Public Elementary and Secondary Schools” from
USDE.
_______________________________
________________
Name
of District
Date
_______________________________
________________
Name
of District Superintendent
Phone Number
________________________________
Signature
of District Superintendent
Poverty
Counts – Federal and State
Finally,
I would like to recapitulate some information we have shared with you previously
regarding the issue of the poverty counts used by the federal government for the
Title 1 program and by the state for the poverty component of General State
Aid.
Federal: We have no
say in the federal government’s use of census figures to determine distribution
of Title 1 money.
The
U.S. Census Bureau recently released the 1999 Small Area Income Poverty
Estimates for school districts, which the U.S. Department of Education will
use as the basis for Title I
funding. In addition to SAIPE, the
Department of Education will include other poverty measures, such as children in
(1) institutions for the neglected and delinquent; (2) foster homes; and (3)
families above poverty receiving assistance under the TANF program. However, children from these three other
poverty measures will add little to the Title I–eligible count for districts –
only 0% to about 5%.
SAIPE
data for your district is at http://www.census.gov/housing/saipe/sd99/sd99_IL.dat. For the poverty estimate, look at the
third column of data after the district name. It comes just before “sd99_IL.dat” in
the fourth column.
The
Census Bureau has provided an appeal process for those who believe a SAIPE
estimate is incorrect. Appeals
should be sent directly to the U. S. Census Bureau to Dr. Daniel Weinberg,
Chief, Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division, U.S. Census
Bureau,
For
details on appeals, please refer to Question #24, and if you have other related
questions, refer to Question #25 of the Frequently-Asked-Questions section of
the SAIPE Web site at http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/saipe/faq.html.
State: The poverty
component of the Illinois General State Aid formula will be based on a separate
set of poverty data derived from decennial census – unless the General Assembly
enacts legislation to change to a different
measure.
ISBE
supports the recommendation of the Education Funding Advisory Board that the
state should adopt the use of the count of children from low-income households
as determined by the Department of Human Services as the measure used in the
calculation of the GSA poverty grant.
This
approach is embodied in House Bill 430, which ISBE supports. If you believe the
DHS count gives a more accurate picture of poverty in our state, contact your
legislators regarding HB 430.
Robert
Schiller
State
Superintendent
of
Education
statesup@isbe.net